|
|
 |
CE For Dummies
 |
 |
|

CE for Dummies;
Certification - Simply Explained
By: Hans
Haindl, MD
After June 12.1998 the exportation of Medical Devices will not be possible without
CE certification. CE not only harmonizes manufacturing procedures and Marketing
requirements for 16 (!) European Nations. It also ensures that with a single Quality
Assurance system, Medical Device Manufacturers will in future also be able to market new
products without having to perform lengthy individual product certification procedures
beforehand. A number of things need doing first. This is a detailed description of the
steps you will be required to take in order to secure CE certification.
At initial glance it could be accepted that a sudden, (and very different), European
ruling demanding a completely new type of certification, may lead to the supposition that
an artificial trade barrier was being created - especially when considering current US
experience - where manufacturers are able to export their products world-wide based solely
upon valid GMP-certification. It oughtn't be negated however that in future, the European
Economic Union requires the same certification process from their own, home-based
manufacturers.
The only significant difference between both parties is the fact
that non-European manufacturers, (world-wide), are called upon to appoint an Authorized
European Representative/ Address living within the European Community, someone to attend
to day-to-day, ongoing Regulatory Affairs. Yet even here, differences between the European
Directives and existing FDA- Regulations is shrinking. As of this year, (1996), the FDA
requires all non-American manufacturers to appoint an "Authorized Agent" living
within the US. Furthermore, a recent draft on forthcoming GMP-guidelines orientates itself
very much along the same lines as that of ISO 9001, thus in itself becoming very similar
to that of European Directives. It could therefore be claimed that it will only be a
question of time before both parties mutually agree to recognize each others Medical
Device certification policies.
Bearing all this in mind, US manufacturers ought really perceive the
coming of CE, and the resulting consequences of fulfilling CE Regulations, very much as
the foundation stone for forthcoming American Regulations - which inevitably are on the
horizon, due to a home-market movement being instigated by the FDA!
The arrival of the CE Directives was applauded by all European Medical
Device Manufacturers. For those manufacturers who depended upon a governmental body of one
description or another for approval and certification of their products, there are without
doubt numerous advantages to be gained by the freedom of selecting a Notified Body
of their own choosing. A number of Member States, (and in particular Germany), have
appointed and delegated the task to a number of small Notified Bodies who, it could be
claimed, are far more flexible than larger institutions.
A major advantage is that with a single certificate, access to all
Member States within the EU is possible - an unthinkable approach in the past. Although on
average harder to obtain than any single (Country specific) certificate in the past, CE
certification generally requires less involvement than all previous individual Country
specific legislation put together. It can therefore be assumed that in future, the costs
involved for abiding by European legislation will not increase.
Directive 93/42/EEC
For anyone without Regulatory Affairs experience and background
knowledge, understanding Governmental Rules and Regulations in the form of Directives can,
at first glance, be quite daunting. Like all things however, the situation changes
dramatically once the given scenario has been fully explained! Therefore, in order to
satisfy the aim of this article, here follows a brief outline on the layout and contents
of Directive 93/42/EEC:
|
Classification and involvement of the
Notified Body (with product examples)
|
MEDICAL DEVICE CLASS |
I |
I (sterile and/or Measuring) |
IIa |
IIb |
III |
|
Degree ofVulnerability/Risk Potential |
low |
low |
medium |
elevated |
high |
|
Product Example |
non-sterile dressings, bandages, hospital gowns, light sources |
Spirometers, urin drainage bags, digital thermometers |
IV catheters, tubings for anesthesia/ ventilation,TENS devices |
intraocular lenses, breast implants, endoprostheses, ventilators |
heart valves, reabsorbable implants |
|
Involvement of Notified Body |
self-certification Declaration of Conformity |
self-certification Declaration of Conformity + Notified Body for
measuring function/ sterility procedures |
mandatory |
mandatory |
mandatory
|
1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
contents of the Directive- General Rules (broken
down into 23 Articles)
2. ANNEXES I - XII
- Annex I - General Requirements
- Annex II - EC Declaration of Conformity (Full Quality Assurance system i.e.
ISO 9001 + EN 46001 + Directive specific requirements)
- Annex III - EC Type-Examination
- Annex IV - EC Verification i.e. batch testing
- Annex V - EC Declaration of Conformity (Production Quality Assurance i.e.
ISO 9002 + EN 46002 + Directive specific requirements)
- Annex VI - EC Declaration of Conformity (Product Quality Assurance i.e. ISO
9003 + Directive specific requirements)
- Annex VII - EC Declaration of Conformity i.e. self-
- certification for Class I products
- Annex VIII - Statement concerning devices for special purposes
- Annex IX - Classification criteria i.e. rules for the classification of
products
- Annex X - Clinical evaluation (self explanatory)
- Annex XI - Criteria to be met for the designation of Notified Bodies
- Annex XII - CE Marking of conformity
STEP 1
Classify your product(s) according to Annex IX
The classification of products plays an extremely important role.
This must be undertaken with the greatest of care - where necessary with the help of
experts. The use of classification lists is not recommended because all lists
currently available make the same fundamental mistake. Decisive is the intended and
declared use of the product involved and NOT solely, (as has been the case in the past),
that of the products current features.By far the best approach currently available is
that from a draft taken from the EU guidelines.(MEDDEV.10/93 - rev.4 (6. July '95)
STEP 2
Conformity Assessment Procedure
Annex 1 (& 7 - for Class 1 + IIa) PLUS either: Annex 2, 4, 5 or 6 for
Classes IIa, IIb abd III (and also possibly Annex 3)
Non-Sterile Class I Products, without a measuring function,
can obtain CE-recognition via ANNEXES 1 & 7 - the process of self-certification
through 'Declaration of Conformity'. For this procedure, the manufacturer ought to be
conversant with the Directive and self-certifies, according to Annex 7, that
his/her manufacturing is in compliance with the essential requirements (Annex 1).

Class I products, sterile and/or with measuring function(s), can obtain CE
certification through self-declaration but require additional certification for the
sterility procedure and/or measuring function(s) via a Notified Body.
For all products classified IIa, IIb and III, Conformity
Assessment is undoubtedly the hardest part of the entire exercise, for it entails
decision-making based upon a (high) number of possible variables. The variables involved
are individualistic and therefore differ for every Medical Device Manufacturer. They
include questions concerning:
- Time-frame available for obtaining CE certification
(Are you in a hurry? Are your Distributors pressurizing you, in order to get CE?)
- Degree of in-house manufacturing
(Vendor situation, who supplies what, to whom and at what level?)
- Current level of QA System
(established ISO-system?)
- Number of employees
- Future activities and aims of the manufacturer
- Forthcoming FDA regulations, (as previously mentioned).
It is therefore highly advisable to secure the services of a
reputable Regulatory Affairs Consultant, someone well versed in European Directive 93/42.
It goes without saying that the selected person(s) should also be conversant with FDA
regulations! It is the task of the Consultant to assess the manufacturer for conformity -
to stock-take the current in-house situation, (with all its' variables), and to plot the
best route to take. The following charts outline the routes available, depending on prior
product classification:
STEP 3
Certification
As the charts illustrate, there are a number of routes or options
open - however, ALL require certification via a recognized European Notified
Body, appointed by the Authorities to certify for Medical Devices. This fact has
already caused a lot of trouble due to the fact that manufacturers both in the US and
Europe were under the impression that ISO 9000 Certification was perfectly sufficient.
Based upon this misjudgment, numerous manufacturers, (on both sides of the Atlantic), were
sold ISO-Certificates by people NOT accredited as Notified Bodies. As a result,
substantial costs were incurred, that could, (and should), have been avoided.
Over and above the aforementioned evidence of Quality Assurance -
and depending upon the risk-factor involved - certain products will require EC Type
Examination. Here too, the Notified Body of your choice will be required to certify the
product(s) involved - in this case, in accordance with EC Type Examination. The
Notified Body is able to accept test results from the manufacturer or from another source
i.e. laboratory.

It should be noted at this point, that not all of the recognized
Notified Bodies operate in the US - to our knowledge, only approximately 10 offer their
services actively in America. Here are a few suggestions on the selective criteria for
choosing a Notified Body for CE Audit:
- Do they cover the full product range?
- Can they Audit for ALL Annexes? (e.g. some differ on Annex III capabilities)
- Do they have the necessary experience with your kind of product(s)?
- Are they active within the United States?
- Are they small, flexible and therefore (hopefully) non-institutional

STEP 4
Appoint an Authorized European Address
(Annex I -
Essential Requirements - PLUS Annex 7)
Every non-European manufacturer exporting to Europe must have an
Authorized European Address. At first glance, this appears to be easier to comply with
than is actually the case, although once again, this is relative and not as difficult as
it first sounds.
Certainly the most obvious course to take is that of appointing a
European Distributor. The thus nominated Distributor appears on all product labeling.
However, this easily causes conflict between Distributors and more often than not, a
Distributor is unable to fulfil the requirements necessary for that of an Authorized
Address. The whole point of having an Authorized Address is to ensure that the
responsibilities for Medical Device Reporting (MDRs) is delegated to someone living in
Europe and who is governed by European law. The employees of the Distributor must posses
certain (minimum) qualifications. Over and above this, a contract between both must exist,
allowing the Authorized Address access to product Master Files should a European
government office require insight into them.
This means that when the appointment of Authorized European Address involves a
Distributor, the manufacturer has to hand-over his Product Documentation and Master Files
during instances involving MDRs to the Distributor. This can't be in the interests of
a non-European manufacture due to the fact that a Distributor always poses the threat of
one day becoming a competitor! It is therefore far more advantageous to completely
separate the regulatory obligations from those of sales and marketing objectives. It is
possible to appoint MDSS - Medical Device Safety Service - a company created especially
for this task, with the burden of responsibility that goes with that of Authorized
Address. Its' personnel is geared specifically for the task, duties and responsibilities
that go with the appointment. Conflicts of interest that can occur with the appointment of
a Distributor are ruled out, due to the fact that MDSS has no product related commercial
interest.

Important Aspects of the Label
Pre-requisite for the certification of products is, apart from other
things, that labeling and Instructions-for-Use are available in languages deemed necessary
for Europe. The following example illustrates what MUST appear on the label. Note
the importance and positioning of the 'Authorized European Address'.
Prepare for CE Certification now
All Medical Device manufacturers are required to have CE certification by no later than
June 12. 1998. Manufacturers of products classified IIa, IIb & III will
inevitably require some form of Quality Assurance system, preferably ISO 9001, (due to
forthcoming FDA regulations). THE TIME-FRAME INVOLVED TO IMPLEMENT A QA SYSTEM WILL VARY
FROM MANUFACTURER TO MANUFACTURER, BUT WILL TAKE (ON AVERAGE) 9 - 12 MONTHS! Without CE
certification, no Medical Device manufacturer will be allowed to market and sell his/her
product(s) after June 1998.
Those manufacturers who start proceedings NOW, will have no trouble meeting the
looming deadline - and thus secure future export sales to Europe. Providing that the
strategy for CE certification has been well planed and a competent Notified Body has been
chosen, this exercise needs doing once only and will be the foundation stone for
forthcoming FDA regulations.

Pre-requisite for CE certification is the appointment of an Authorized European Address
for Medical Device Reporting - an agent contractually tied to the manufacturer and who
acts as interface between manufacturer and Authorities. This delicate task, (for a number
of reasons), should not be given to a Distributor but rather a professional Consultancy
company who knows what they are doing and who has no interests in sales and marketing
activities. The appointment demands that the Authorized Representative be placed on all
labeling and Instructions-For-Use. Consequently, there are legal ramifications involved
for both parties!
Dr. Hans Haindl, MD is a member of the MDSS Scientific Board. After
earning degrees in both engineering and medicine, he went on to spend 6 years in clinical
environments before then becoming the head of R&D for B. Braun AG, a large German
medical device manufacturer. Commencing in 1991, he became a medical device consultant and
is currently Chairman of the German Federation of Medical Device Experts
© September 1996, The Validation Consultant - a Booth Scientific
Publication
Reprinted with permission of the publisher
Return To Previous Page
|
|
 |